Diana and LaCarta – 18th c. – Hand-carved Ornate Gilt Frames
Left - Diana, Right - La Carta.
-
La Carta is attributed to a “Prof. Giotti” from “The French School,” which is believed to have been in Paris. Numerous documents regarding this piece refer to the artist’s name with a number of different spellings (Gotti, Giotti, Giotta, Giotto), which could be a translation or phonetic spelling. Diana was purchased as a sister piece to La Carta and is attributed to a student of “Prof. “Giotti” at the French school. This piece was originally thought to depict the Roman goddess of Minerva (also known as the Greek goddess Athena), but the symbolism in the painting evidenced the Roman myth of Diana instead (also known as Artemis in Greek mythology).
-
Although the treatment of the paintings was important, these spectacular frames are the story we would like to talk about. Expertly hand-carved and gilded and using paper-thin sheets of gold leaf, each of the two frame makers used both water and oil gilding techniques to create the superb frames. Many of the finishing touches were highlighted by burnishing the gold over a surface of porous colored clay bole. The preparatory gesso undercoating and surface gilding were cracked, detaching, and flaking throughout both of the frames. The majority of the sections where gold leaf was attached using a water-soluble adhesive (water gilding), was now abraded from years of dusting with a damp cloth (The adhesive used for this gilding was water soluble. It slowly wears away every time it was cleaned). The La Carta frame was in much worse condition than Diana’s frame. The wooden substrates of both frames had shrunk slightly with age and created voids between the backside of the gesso coating and the wood. When these fragile areas were hit or touched, the gesso had crumbled and flaked away. The surfaces of the frames were also noticeably dirty. In addition to the surface damage, there were more than a dozen parts of carved ornamentation missing from each frame. Several of the wooden sections were cracked or had fallen off through the years and were now missing. Much of the original animal skin glue holding the joints together had failed with age. The top central carved element on the Diana painting was very fragile, and badly damaged.